Brand Spirit

I had breakfast with Russell Davies today, which was very nice. Good guy. And head of planning EMEA for Ogilvy nowadays. The most interesting part of the conversation, of which many parts were interesting, was the idea about how the best brands convey a feeling or spirit or essence which almost defys definition. How many times have you heard people talk about the idea behind Nike or Apple and yet they seldom use the same words, the exact words, to describe the idea. Yet, somehow, we all recognise it. We recognise it almost inspite of the different, and often inexact descriptions of the idea because we have a quite refined and shared sense of what 'Nike-ness' is all about.

This conversation reminded me of a meeting a few years ago with a client who had the issue of how to brief local offices on how to generate creative work. Merely generating ads that LOOKED correct ie had the right visual equities, wasn't right as it didn't communicate the IDEA. If would be better to get the idea right even if the visual equities weren't quite the same, though it would be better if they were. Or at least FELT as if they were.

I came to this conclusion about a brand's spirit back then. It was as though you need to live with the campaign or the brand for long enough to 'know it when you see it'. To do this amongst the client/agency team takes a while in itself. To do it amongst a target audience, a country, a region, the world, takes a long time. Yet it works. No wonder great, lasting brands, take time to put together and build up a head of steam. And incidentally, it might also explain, certainly with Nike and Apple why their agencies have been with them for so long, because, they FEEL it too.

There are many implications of this, but the one to mention now is that the getting the exact exact word, phrase, nuance may matter a little less than getting the feeling right. Words, imagery, film, humour, tone of voice, use of language, personality, all matter.